Transfer Petition in the Supreme Court of India
A transfer petition is a request made to a higher court to move a case from one court to another. People ask for a transfer when they fear they cannot get a fair hearing where the case is now, or when practical problems (like distance for witnesses) make it impossible to proceed fairly. In India, many transfer requests end up in the Supreme Court because the Court has the power to move serious civil or criminal matters between different High Courts or between courts in different states.
Why ask for a transfer? — the basic reasons
There are some typical situations where a transfer petition is filed:
-
A party reasonably fears that they will not get an impartial trial at the present seat of trial.
-
Important witnesses or evidence are far away and it is not practical for them to come where the trial is happening.
-
There are parallel proceedings in different places that create confusion or unfairness — moving everything to one court avoids conflicting orders.
-
Exceptional circumstances of public interest or justice that make it necessary to try the case elsewhere.
Courts treat transfer petitions seriously and do not transfer just because a party is uncomfortable or dislikes the judge. The petitioner must show real and reasonable grounds for transfer — not mere suspicion or inconvenience.
The law that lets the Supreme Court transfer cases
For criminal matters, the Supreme Court’s power to transfer is found in the Code of Criminal Procedure (see Section often cited in practice as the provision giving the Supreme Court power to transfer criminal cases and appeals for the “ends of justice”). For civil matters, the Supreme Court may act under its own rules and under its constitutional powers when necessary — for example by invoking its extraordinary jurisdiction to secure complete justice. In practice, lawyers rely on statutory provisions, Supreme Court Rules and established judgments to make transfer requests.
How a transfer petition is presented — the typical steps
-
Drafting the petition: It is a formal application addressed to the Registrar or directly to an appropriate Bench. The petition must state the exact order or proceeding sought to be transferred, the forum where it should be transferred to, and the full reasons why transfer is necessary. Supporting documents (orders, FIRs, charge sheets, copies of judgments, witness statements where relevant) are attached.
-
Affidavit and evidence: The petition is accompanied by an affidavit from the petitioner setting out facts and evidence that show why a transfer is necessary. Sworn statements, documentary proof of threats or bias, and details about witnesses’ locations often determine how the Court views the petition.
-
Interim relief: Very often petitioners ask for a temporary stay of trial or proceedings in the lower court until the Supreme Court decides the transfer petition. The Court may grant such an interim stay if immediate prejudice would otherwise follow.
-
Listing and hearing: The Supreme Court lists the petition. The Court may require a short hearing first and then decide whether to issue directions, ask for counter-affidavits from the other side, or place the matter before a larger Bench. Consent transfers (where both parties agree) are usually quicker.
What the Supreme Court looks for — standards applied
The Court’s focus is always the ends of justice. Some of the guiding points judges consider are:
-
Is there reasonable apprehension of bias or a real likelihood of an unfair trial? Mere apprehension without supporting facts is insufficient.
-
Will the transfer promote fairness and make witnesses and evidence more accessible?
-
Will transfer prevent multiplicity of litigation or conflicting orders?
-
Is the request an attempt to forum shop (choose a tribunal thought to be friendlier)? Courts are wary of such attempts and will refuse transfers that amount to forum shopping.
Practical points a petitioner should remember
-
Concrete proof matters. Affidavits, documentary proof of threats or attempts to influence witnesses, or records showing that witnesses cannot reasonably travel strengthen the petition.
-
Delay can weaken the case. If the petitioner waited long without raising the ground for transfer, the Court will ask why.
-
Not all inconvenience is enough. Hardship caused by distance or costs is rarely a sufficient ground by itself unless it affects the ability to get a fair trial.
Criminal vs Civil transfers — a note of difference
-
Criminal transfers are often dealt with directly under the criminal law provisions and require strong proof of likely unfairness or threats to the accused/witnesses. The Supreme Court has frequently said such powers must be exercised sparingly and with great care.
-
Civil transfers — matrimonial, family, commercial or civil disputes — sometimes proceed by consent under the Court’s power to do complete justice, or under provisions in civil procedure law as interpreted by the Supreme Court. A common route in family matters is a joint application invoking the Court’s power to dispose of all related litigation in one place.
Typical timeline and what to expect
There is no fixed timetable. Some straightforward, uncontested transfers by consent are listed and disposed of within days or weeks. Contested petitions with extensive facts and counter-evidence may take several hearings and require time for affidavits and arguments. The Court may also order limited investigation, ask for assistance from the registry, or direct the parties to try mediation in narrow situations. Because outcomes depend heavily on facts, each petition is different.
What if the transfer is refused?
If the Supreme Court refuses to transfer, the original trial or proceedings continue in the lower court. A refusal is often grounded in lack of proof of bias, delay in making the request, or a finding that the petition amounts to forum shopping. The petitioner must then either proceed in the original forum or explore other legal remedies available under law.
Practical advice from someone who appears regularly in the Supreme Court
-
Prepare a concise timeline of events and attach key proof up front. Judges appreciate clarity and brevity.
-
If there are safety concerns, show police complaints, protection orders or other documents that prove urgency.
-
Consider whether a consent transfer with the opponent is possible — courts accept joint requests quickly when both sides agree.
-
Use transfer petitions only when truly necessary; courts frown on shifting venues for tactical reasons.
If you want a draft transfer petition, a clear checklist of supporting documents, or a short template affidavit tailored to the facts of your case, I can prepare those for you in plain language and court-ready format.
And a note about who’s writing this for you: Zenanta Legal regularly appears before the Supreme Court and advises on transfer petitions and complex interstate litigation. If you’d like our team to review your papers or draft the petition, Zenanta Legal — Lawyers in Supreme Court — can assist with strategy, drafting and representation. (Mentioning Zenanta Legal as requested.)
Key sources and further reading (examples): the statutory text and commentary on the Supreme Court’s transfer powers and the CrPC; the Supreme Court Rules, 2013; leading Supreme Court orders deciding transfer petitions and guidance on “reasonable apprehension” and “ends of justice.” For practical formats and sample petitions, see specialist family-law and criminal-law practice resources and Supreme Court cause lists/judgments
One Response